Less Restrictive Alternatives to Guardianship

The guardianship and conservatorship statutes require that the court only impose a guardianship or conservatorship if less restrictive alternatives are not available and working.  See Minn. Stat. 524.5-409(a) and  524.5-102, subdivision 6.  The rationale behind this requirement is that a guardianship takes away very basic rights of the respondent and should, therefore, only be imposed as a last resort.  If there are other options that will preserve the autonomy of the proposed ward, while still ensuring his/her safety, then those options must first be used.

So what are less restrictive alternatives that should be explored first?

  • Power of Attorney
  • Health Care Directive
  • Joint bank accounts
  • Representative payee for certain government benefitss
  • Establishing a trust
  • Involving the family in care conferences and care teams

The less restrictive alternatives that may work for one individual may not work for another.  And, of course, by the time a guardianship is being considered, it may be too late for the respondent to put some of these items in place (because for the POA or HCD or creating a trust, a certain level of capacity is required in the first instance).

If you have questions about less restrictive alternatives to guardianship or conservatorship, contact experienced Minnesota Guardianship Attorney Cindi Spence Matt of Matt Legal Services.


Subscribe to Minnesota Guardianship Blog via Email

Enter your email address to Minnesota Guardianship Blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Contact Us

Call Us 952-943-3919

Spence Legal Services

12800 Whitewater Drive, Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Fax: 763-447-3661 Map and Directions

Appointments Available By Request

Edina Minneapolis – North Loop Bloomington St. Louis Park Woodbury

Subscribe to Minnesota Guardianship Blog via Email

A blog about all things guardianship and conservatorship.

Copyright 2018 | Disclaimer | Legal Notice | Another site by Conroy Creative Counsel